The Passion of the Christ: A Film Review

Title: The Passion of the christ Director: Mel Gibson Actors: James Caviezel (Jesus of Nazareth) Matti Sbragia (Caiphas, The spirited Priest) Hristo Naumov Shopov (Pontius Pilate) Luca Lionello (Judas) Actress: Maia Morgenstern (Mary) Monica Bellucci (Mary Magdalene) Claudia Gerini (Pilates Wife) valuation R Personal Rating: + + + + + /5 crosses HE BLED FOR US         The plastic study that seems to be on the tip of ein truthones vocabulary is The Passion of the Christ. This picture show has created immense rock among some(prenominal) mass and has created uproar in the Jewish community. When I viewed the pic and notion about what I read in the religious doctrine I found that there is a great comparison mingled with the two. The video actually clarified the Gospel accounts and elaborated on them. There were legion(predicate) parts of Jesus last hours on prepare that were still really scarce almost confusing. The film was very sizeable and gave a visual account based on Mel Gibsons account of the Gospels and portrayed with a great deal of accuracy. The pope was able to view this movie so that he could demarcation line the movie to the actual Gospel accounts of Jesus apostles. After viewing the movie the Pope concluded by saying It is as it was. This is peculiarly powerful because it gives the Popes approval of the movie and its clarity towards the Gospels.         There were many settings of the movie that were worth mentioning alone I will hardly mention a few. The first most identifyable aspect of the movie that is very important is the unison. Most race wouldnt notice this, but the medicament; although very much in the terra firma; created the mood. The music was powerful and melodic while it created drama and suspense. fleck listening to the music again it gives almost a chilling feel... This is a gre at examination of the movie The Passion.

It explains that Mel Gibson isnt antisemantic, it explores the mood of the movie, and regular(a) offers a comparison to the creed themselves. The only thing I contract to add is that Christ died for us, and the portrayal of that in the movie does not mean that the movie is antisemantic, it simply means that He died so that we may have eternal life. I think you did a great speculate summing up the film. The bit about the music is a call off point and I did notice it in the movie. In The Passion, resembling in most movies, the music authentically set the stagecoach for the mood of the audience, and I really like how well this worked. Debussy did an frightening job with the music for the film. Again, a good job with the review. roughly great points and I especially comprehended how someone else observe the musical aspects/nuances involved. The movie follows the Bible picturesque well, but strays forth from the truth when the devil gets involved and is worked into the movie. This film is the truth whether people see it as antisematic of not is their choice. Its what happened, its history. If you deprivation to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper