Critical Evaluation of the Cognitive Theory of Stereotyping

Stereotyping is a form of pre sentiment that is as prevalent in todays nine as it was 2000 years ago. It is a hearty attitude that has stood the political campaign of time and received some(prenominal) attention by tender psychologists and philosophers alike. Many approaches to, or theories of stereotyping prolong thus been raised. This attempt evaluates the cognitive approach that categorisation is an congenital cognitive answer that inevitably leads to stereotyping. Hamilton (1979) calls this a depressing dilemma.\n\nBrowns (1995) definition of stereotyping done prejudice is the holding of derogatory social attitudes or cognitive beliefs, the rumination of negative affect, or the uncover of hostile or preferential behaviour towards members of a pigeonholing on account of their social status to that ag group. This definition implies that stereotyping is primarily a group process, through the individuals psyches inside that group. A further liking of stereotyping, de fined by Allport (1954) as thinking ill of others without warrant, is that people make their disposition up without any personal experience. This pre judgement about a solely group is then transferred to the branding of any individuals in that group. It is these ideas that the essay aims to evaluate, through the cognitive process of categorisation and the above definitions that subscribe about three apparent romps of stereotyping, that our cognition can be demonstrated through.\n\nThe first quality of stereotyping is over-generalisation. A number of studies conducted open that different combinations of traits were associated with groups of different ethnic and national origin (Katz and Braly, 1933). However, stereotyping does not imply that all members of a group are judged in these ways, just that a natural member of a group can be categorised in such judgements, that they give birth the characteristics of the group. Still, when we talk of a group, we do so by imagini ng a member of that group.\n\nThe second feature and characteristic of stereotyping is the exaggeration of the discrimination between ones own group (the in-group) and the other group (the out-group). This can be traced back to the work of Tajfel during the 1950s - the emphasizing principle (Tajfel, 1981). Tajfels work was specifically on physical stimuli, and concluded that judgements on such stimuli are not made in isolation, scarcely in the context of other factors. Applied socially - a judgement about an out-group relies upon other factors surrounding the judgement in question, as...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.